The Ownership Void

Edition #12: The Ownership Void

"This EC2 instance has been running for 18 months at $400/month. Nobody knows what it does or who owns it."

You encounter this doing cost reviews, investigating security alerts, or auditing cloud spend. The resource lacks an owner tag. It's tagged with someone who left months ago. The tag says "engineering". Security alerts can't be routed. Finance can't allocate costs. Operations won't decommission without approval from someone who actually knows what it does.

This is The Ownership Void - when cloud resources exist but nobody knows who's accountable for them. It happens because ownership isn't static. People leave, teams reorganize, automation provisions resources without human owners, and acquisitions bring infrastructure with unknown provenance. Even well-tagged resources become orphaned when organizational structure shifts.

The Standards Practice from the 5 Practices of Cloud Governance addresses this by treating ownership as living metadata that requires ongoing maintenance:

• Capture creator context - tag who provisioned the resource as a starting point
• Validate ownership continuously - review and update as people and teams change
• Handle transitions explicitly - update ownership when people leave or change roles
• Route based on current state - use the best available metadata (creator, team, cost center) to assign findings
• Accept imperfect information - work with incomplete tags rather than waiting for perfect data

Ownership voids are inevitable in dynamic organizations. Effective governance means having a process to maintain accountability as change happens.

- Keep on Herding, Bob

What's Happening in Cloud Governance 📡

Three Silent Killers of Cloud ROI: Ken Ramirez identifies $1.2M in annual waste at a Fortune 500 manufacturer across three categories. The "Tagging Theater" finding is particularly relevant to ownership - while the company achieved 87% tagging coverage optimized for finance reporting, they lacked visibility into feature-level costs. Tags served accounting needs but prevented engineering decisions, resulting in $315K/year in waste from poor lifecycle management. The lesson: tags that serve one stakeholder but not others create ownership gaps. Implementing dual-layer tagging (financial + decision-making) enabled "cost-per-transaction" metrics and proper ownership accountability.

Unlocking the Power of the Cloud: Meredith Stein and David Linthicum's new book delivers a business-first framework for governing cloud and AI together. Written for CEOs, boards, and executives, it addresses how cloud computing fundamentally disrupts corporate governance while creating competitive opportunities. The book covers the critical intersection where cloud infrastructure meets AI deployment, showing how to manage risks that didn't exist five years ago and turn compliance from a cost center into a strategic differentiator. Essential reading for organizations refusing to let their cloud and AI initiatives outpace their governance capabilities.

The Azure Orphaned Resources Workbook: A Hidden Gem for Cloud Cost Optimization: Shaun Wilkinson posts about Dolev Shor's Azure Orphaned Resources Workbook which provides practical tooling for identifying and managing resources without clear ownership. A customer case study demonstrates the impact: $7,000/month saved from unused orphaned disks and $100/month from unused public IPs. The workbook surfaces unattached disks, idle virtual machines, and unused networking components across subscriptions. The real governance insight: orphaned resources aren't just a cost problem - they're ungoverned security risks. Without owners, security findings go unaddressed and compliance becomes impossible. The workbook helps operationalize ownership validation by making the invisible visible.

The Compliance Automation Revolution: Time for Real Change: The Cloud Security Alliance's January 2025 initiative addresses how ownership gaps compound compliance challenges. Organizations must comply with hundreds of data security and privacy laws, but manual evidence collection doesn't scale-especially when resource ownership is unclear. The CAR initiative focuses on automating evidence collection in standardized machine-readable formats and shifting compliance left by embedding ownership checks early in development. When resources are provisioned with ownership metadata from creation, compliance evidence can be automatically routed to the right teams. The initiative recognizes that automation helps maintain ownership accountability at scale.

Get Involved 👋

Join the conversation on LinkedIn about this newsletter edition.